From Sr. Bernadino to the Actuary magazine
- On the shortcomings of Solvency I - "...if you have more risk, you should have more capital"
- "I think it will take until then [2016] to get started" on Solvency II
- "We [EIOPA] believe 2014 and 2015 can be used as an opportunity to enter into the system in a better way"
- "Solvency II will be implemented, and there should be no doubt about it"
- "EIOPA will do the necessary work to make the implementation of Solvency II happen on January 2016"
- Emphasises that we are "not building from Solvency I", in the face of "Solvency 1.5" questions
- Notes that EIOPA's opinion on interim measures is borne from concerns that the delay may lead to "different national solutions [emerging] to the detriment of a good functioning market"
- "Differences between supervisory cultures" is part of the IMAP inconsistency problem - no implication that either the UK is doing too much or mainland Europe not enough
- Makes the point that stakeholders "...must avoid the temptation of re-opening more issues" - hard to think of any contentious issues which aren't already wide open for debate, but clearly some concern that the current smorgasbord could be supplemented.
- For those at the smaller end of the market, he gies a specific example of where an Actuarial function could be staffed by someone other than a "pure actuary"
All this in the week where a succession of industry figures in London lined up to flog Solvency II's hobbling carcass, whether it be the IMAP element (Hiscox), or the very premise of one-size-fits-all regulation (Pru). Not a good week to be trying to kill a horse in the UK gents...
No comments:
Post a Comment