The survey on that white paper's content was quite telling - bearing in mind the sample is still relatively small (23 respondents), they were nicely split between agreement and ambivalence on;
- Whether the white paper provided a "workable basis" for developing risk appetite and risk tolerance approaches
- Whether there was sufficient guidance on the development of risk appetite in the doc
- Whether there was sufficient guidance on board/risk committee oversight of risk appetite development
- Organisations having "multiple risk appetites"
- "Risk management maturity" being an appropriate concept to build appetite and tolerance from (large number of "partially agrees" however, which could mean anything!)
- That more guidance is needed on the concept of "Risk mmanagement maturity"
- That "propensity to take risk" and "propensity to exercise control" are appropriate concepts
- That listed companies should consider shareholder value as an appropriate measure of risk appetite
- That Risk Appetite should be measured
- That there are (a range of ) critical elements missing from the paper (range of qualitative and quantitative suggestions provided)
- That a short version would be appreciated for Board consumption
- That the approach in the White Paper will be useful for Solvency II purposes
Thank you for sharing such great information.
ReplyDeleteIt has help me in finding out more detail about disability policy