The survey on that white paper's content was quite telling - bearing in mind the sample is still relatively small (23 respondents), they were nicely split between agreement and ambivalence on;
- Whether the white paper provided a "workable basis" for developing risk appetite and risk tolerance approaches
- Whether there was sufficient guidance on the development of risk appetite in the doc
- Whether there was sufficient guidance on board/risk committee oversight of risk appetite development
- Organisations having "multiple risk appetites"
- "Risk management maturity" being an appropriate concept to build appetite and tolerance from (large number of "partially agrees" however, which could mean anything!)
- That more guidance is needed on the concept of "Risk mmanagement maturity"
- That "propensity to take risk" and "propensity to exercise control" are appropriate concepts
- That listed companies should consider shareholder value as an appropriate measure of risk appetite
- That Risk Appetite should be measured
- That there are (a range of ) critical elements missing from the paper (range of qualitative and quantitative suggestions provided)
- That a short version would be appreciated for Board consumption
- That the approach in the White Paper will be useful for Solvency II purposes